Jacksonville residents are facing some of the hardest times ever. With 46% of Florida Homes worth less than their mortgages notes, a lot of folks are considering bankruptcy.
As attorneys, it is our job to counsel our clients on what action is in their best interest. I have worked at a few different law firms and I have found that there are three schools of thought. The first thought is that the debtor should always keep the house, regardless of it’s value to debt ratio. This philosophy feels that the American Dream should prevail and that every one of us deserves to own a home. While I don’t disagree that we should all have the opportunity to own a home, this philosophy often fails because the debtor’s income is simply too low to make the house payments. Attorneys who say that they always try to save the house either make so much money that they don’t remember what it’s like to struggle or even worse, they’re just telling clients what they think the clients want to hear. Be wary of attorneys who only tell you what you want to hear. That’s a sign of a good salesman, not of a good counselor.
The next school of thought is that the house should always be surrendered if it’s under-water. This purely economical approach makes more sense than the one toting the “American Dream” and it’s quite attractive. However I don’t think it’s enough to consider only the economics of the situation. Bankruptcy attorneys tend to think numbers, because that’s what we deal in, but a wise person once said something to the effect of, “A home is more than just a house.”